I am fully aware that we must not judge a book by its cover. I am also aware that we shouldn't pay too much attention to reviews. But I am pretty sure that we are entitled to judge a book by its first 4 pages.
Last night I fell asleep safe in the knowledge that I'm not missing out on anything by skipping the other 496.
Update:
Okay, okay, I am reading the frigging Da Vinci Code afterall. But only out of desperation as I was off work sick yesterday and had nothing better to do. Turns out that I like a brilliantly crafted yet badly written unfeasible pile of bullshit thriller as much as the next person, as I am almost finished it already.
So far, my favourite part of the book is the disclaimer on the first page, which states that "all descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents and secret rituals in this novel are accurate" – as if stealing all the interesting bits from his art historian wife somehow excuses him from having written little gems such as:
Sophie looked over. 'You're kidding, right? We're going to visit a knight?'
Langdon gave an awkward smile. 'We're on the Grail quest, Sophie. Who better to help us than a knight?'
It's like Scooby Doo for grown-ups (or Harry Potter for kids). But, again, I can hear myself mocking hypocritically. And I'm sure it will redeem itself in the end as, the way things are going now, everything is pointing towards the lovely yet determined Sophie discovering that she is the great-great-great-etc-grandchild of Jesus Christ the Lord.
Marvellous!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
archive
- August 2011 (1)
- July 2011 (2)
- June 2011 (15)
- May 2011 (9)
- April 2011 (19)
- March 2011 (19)
- February 2011 (17)
- January 2011 (2)
- December 2010 (2)
- November 2010 (1)
- October 2010 (3)
- September 2010 (2)
- July 2010 (3)
- June 2010 (3)
- April 2010 (1)
- February 2010 (2)
- January 2010 (2)
- September 2009 (1)
- August 2009 (4)
- July 2009 (4)
- June 2009 (3)
- May 2009 (8)
- April 2009 (11)
- March 2009 (12)
- February 2009 (9)
- January 2009 (4)
- December 2008 (10)
- November 2008 (27)
- October 2008 (21)
- September 2008 (12)
- August 2008 (9)
- July 2008 (11)
- June 2008 (5)
- May 2008 (5)
- April 2008 (12)
- March 2008 (10)
- February 2008 (11)
- January 2008 (15)
- December 2007 (10)
- November 2007 (9)
- October 2007 (3)
- September 2007 (9)
- August 2007 (8)
- July 2007 (10)
- June 2007 (13)
- May 2007 (14)
- April 2007 (11)
- March 2007 (11)
- February 2007 (12)
- January 2007 (9)
- December 2006 (4)
- November 2006 (10)
- October 2006 (8)
- September 2006 (12)
- August 2006 (19)
- July 2006 (22)
- June 2006 (7)
- May 2006 (25)
- April 2006 (18)
- March 2006 (5)
- April 2004 (1)
- November 1998 (1)
- March 1980 (1)

Try Eco's Foucault's Pendulum instead of Brown's Da Vinci Code. Or both, if you are a manic reader as some of us are.
ReplyDeleteI read one of his non-fiction works on semiotics when I was in college (design student) and always meant to read something else of his, but just ... well, forgot about him really. I will check it out.
ReplyDeleteI used to be a manic reader. I don't know what happened. The pub, maybe?
All book suggestions welcome, please. I need something to get stuck into.
Apparently 'J'apprends a lire avec sami at juli' by Cecconello is very good. Couldn't understand a bloody word of it myself. It was in french.
ReplyDeleteUgh! Isn't the Da Vinci Code a bit like Harry Potter for sensible shoe- wearing grown ups. Too much hype, too many weeks at the top of book charts, too much airport outlet promotion nightmare. I'm not going there.
ReplyDelete